Efficacy assessment of the system of social and hygienic monitoring of patients with bronchial asthma

Objective. To assess efficacy of the social and hygienic monitoring system based on determining the level of satisfaction of medical workers with the organization of its activities for patients with bronchial asthma and patients at risk of developing bronchial asthma.

Materials and methods. The study used sociological and statistical research methods. The assessment of respondents’ satisfaction, which characterizes the efficacy of social and hygienic monitoring, is based on analysis of 6 blocks. The research volume consisted of 403 respondents. Statistical analysis of the data obtained was carried out using parametric and nonparametric research methods, descriptive statistics methods, and reliability assessments. Statistical data processing was carried out using the Statistical 10 software package.

Results. The majority of respondents believe that the most important measures for social and hygienic monitoring of the health of a patient with bronchial asthma are “identification of risk factors for bronchial asthma”, “organization of monitoring of the patient’s health” and “identification of environmental factors that have a harmful effect on the patient”, the least important measures are “interaction between healthcare organizations and centers hygiene and epidemiology” and “database maintenance”.

The low level of satisfaction of respondents with the social and hygienic monitoring of bronchial asthma was specified based on the fact that a significant part of respondents rated the organization of activities included in 6 blocks as “below average”, the proportion of which ranged from 26% to 41.3%.

The analysis of the correspondence of the actual level to the maximum level of satisfaction with the organization of social and hygienic monitoring of asthma showed that the maximum level of satisfaction was not achieved both in general and in individual blocks, and indicated a low efficiency of the implementation of this process.

Conclusion. Importance rating of social and hygienic monitoring measures which affects formation of the level of satisfaction and assessment of effectiveness of implementation of this process was determined.

1. Ovchinnikova EL, Fridman KB, Novikova JuA. Tasks of social and hygienic monitoring in new legal conditions. Health is the basis of human potential: problems and ways to solve them. 2018;2(13): 939-949. (In Russ.).

2. Zaitseva NV, May IV, Kiryanov DA, Goryaev DV, Kleyn SV. Social and hygienic monitoring today: state and prospects in conjunction with the risk-based supervision. Health Risk Analysis, 2016;(4):4-16. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2016.4.01.eng

3. Tsunina NM, Jernov YuV. The algorithm of application of results of social hygienic monitoring at regional level. Problemi socialnoi gigieni, zdravookhranenia i istorii meditsini. 2016;24(2):77-81. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0869-866X-2016-24-2-77-81

4. Нindziuk LL, Moroz IN. Organization of social-hygienic monitoring of bronchial asthma of child population in the Republic of Belarus. Issues of Organization and Informatization of Healthcare. 2021;2(107):56-62 (in Russ.).

5. Aydinov GT, Marchenko BI, Sinelnikova YuA. The application of complex assessment of the health status of the population in tasks of the improvement of the for socio-hygienic monitoring system. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal) 2016;95(10):980-985. (In Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2016-95-10-980-985

6. Kolomin VV, Latyshevskaya NI, Rybkin VS, Kudryasheva IA. Interregional analysis of the incidence as an instrument of improvement of the system of socio-hygienic monitoring. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2021;100(6):633-639. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-6-633-639

7. Tikhonova IV, Zemlyanova MA. Social-hygienic monitoring system updating based on health risk analysis (at the municipal level). Health Risk Analysis. 2019;(4):60-68. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2019.4.06.eng

8. Savelyev SI, Trukhina GM, Bondarev VA, Nakhichevanskaya NV. Development of social and hygienic monitoring at the regional level. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal) 2016;95(11):1033-1036. (In Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2016-95-11-1033-1036

9. Shulgina SV. Тhe health system responsiveness: definition, structure, concepts, methodological approaches to research. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2015;22(2):27-32. (In Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/humeco17139

10. Vaskes Abanto H. Jestuardo, Vaskes Abanto AJe, Arel’jano Vaskes Susan Evolution of the concept of quality of medical care. Problems of Standardization in Healthcare. 2016;(11-12):17-22. (In Russ.).

11. Duganov MD. Assessment of the effectiveness of healthcare costs at the regional and municipal levels. Moscow: IEPP. 2007. 112. [accessed 2024 December 17]. Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-effektivnosti-rashodov-na-zdravoohranenie-na-regionalnom-i-munitsipalnom-urovnyah/viewer (in Russ.).

12. Kochubej AV. Quality of medical care: theory. Moscow surgical journal. 2017;(1):48-52. (In Russ.).

13. Maslennikova NYu, Slinkova OK. The concept and essence of monitoring from the perspective of a systematic approach. SCIENCE TIME. 2014:110-121 (in Russ.).

14. Gadaborshev MI. Organization, assessment of the effectiveness of medical care: a monograph. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2021. 424 р. (in Russ.).

15. Melik-Gusejnov DV, Emanuel’ V, Hodyreva LA, Turzin LA, Emanuel’ A. The quality management system of medical care in a medical organization. The medical alphabet. The «Review” series». 2019;1(15):53-56. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-1-15(390)-53-56

16. Otdel’nova KA. Determination of the required number of observations in social and hygienic studies. Sat. works of the 2nd MMI. 1980;150(6):18-22. (in Russ.).