The Predictors of Prolonged Second Stage of Labor
https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2019-16-1-9
Abstract
Objective: to study the predictors of prolonged second stage of labor. Material and methods. The study of labors complicated by prolonged second stage has been performed (n = 120). The analysis of the obtained data was carried out in comparison with those of the control group which included primiparas with physiological delivery (n = 30). Results. The labors complicated by prolonged second stage more often started with induction (p = 0.001), more often there was a necessity for oxytocin in delivery (58 % vs 36.6 % in the control group; p = 0.034), the duration of the first stage was longer (435 (295; 520) min vs 305 (255; 470) min; p = 0.035), as well as a higher frequency rate of occiput posterior presentation was noted (14.8% versus 3.3% in the control group; p < 0.001)). Conclusion. The application of labor induction, the necessity for the use of oxytocin, as well as occipital posterior presentation are the predictors for prolonged second period of labor.
About the Authors
V. N. Kalachev
Учреждение образования «Гомельский государственный медицинский университет»
Belarus
Belarus
T. N. Zakharenkova
Учреждение образования «Гомельский государственный медицинский университет»
Belarus
Belarus
References
1. ACOG Practice Bulletin: No. 49. Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;(85);315-24; doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(04)00096-7.
2. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 71. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician - gynecologists. 2006;71.
3. Myles T, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:52-8.
4. Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:85-7.
5. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: Does a prolonged secondstage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210 (6):536.e1-7.
6. Пирогова НИ. Оперативное акушерство. Здоровье Украины. 2011;5:18-20.
7. Davis G, Fleming T, Ford K, Mouawad MR, Ludlow J. Caesarean section at full cervical dilatation. Aust NZ J Obstet& Gynecol. 2015;55(6):565-71.
8. Zhu B, Grigorescu V, Le T. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:121
9. Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Krauss I, Douglas J, Goulet C, Boulvain M. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural anesthesia. The PEOPLE (pushing early or pushing late with epidural) study group. Am J Obstet and Gynecol.2000;182(5):1165-72.
10. Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(3):198-200.
11. Induction of labour data. WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. Geneva, World health Organization, 2010.
12. Ponkey S, Cohen A, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(5):915-20.
Review
For citations:
Kalachev V.N., Zakharenkova T.N. The Predictors of Prolonged Second Stage of Labor. Health and Ecology Issues. 2019;(1):45-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2019-16-1-9
Views: 248
Email this article 