Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in problem microorganisms in patients with purulent wounds
https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2020-17-3-10
Abstract
Objective: to study changes in the resistance of problem microorganisms to antibacterial drugs in patients with purulent wounds. Material and methods. On the basis of a bacteriological laboratory, within 2006-2007 and 2019-2020, 92 and 99 patients with purulent wounds of various locations, respectively, were examined by the standard bacteriological methods. Results. For the past 13 years, significant changes have occurred in the etiological structure of gram-negative problem microorganisms in patients with purulent wounds. Reliably significant increases were found in the share of K. pneumoniae - about 8 times, and A. baumannii - about 9 times. However, the proportion of MRSA has not changed. The most effective drugs for MRSA were vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline - 0 % of resistant isolates; for K. pneumoniae - colistin (0 %), tigecycline (8.33 %); for P. aeruginosа - colistin (0 %), doripenem (45.45 %); for A. baumannii - ampicillin + sulbactam (0 %), colistin (0 %). Conclusions. For infections caused by MRSA , glycopeptides (vancomycin) should be recommended as the drug-of-choice, and the reserve drugs - oxazolidinones (linezolid) and glycylcyclins (tigecycline); K. pneumoniae - colistin and tigecycline; P. aeruginosa - carbapenems (doripenem) and colistin; A.baumannii - penicillins or cephalosporins with sulbactam (ampicillin + sulbactam) and colistin.
About the Authors
S. D. FedyaninBelarus
Sergei D. Fedyanin — Assistant lecturer at the Department of Hospital Surgery of the EE «Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University»
e-mail: fedyanin-1977@mail.ru
V. K. Okulich
Belarus
Vitaly K. Okulich — Assistant lecturer at the Department of Clinical Microbiology of the EE «Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University»
e-mail: vokul@mail.ru
References
1. Гельфанд БР. Сепсис: классификация, клинико-диагностическая концепция и лечение. Москва, РФ: ООО «Медицинское информационное агент-ство»; 2017. 408 с.
2. Гельфанд БР, Кубышкин ВА, Козлов РС, Хачатрян НН. Хирургические инфекции кожи и мягких тканей: Российские национальные рекомендации. Москва, РФ: Изд-во МАИ; 2015. 109 с.
3. Яковлев СВ, Сидоренко СВ, Рафальский ВВ, Спичак ТВ. Стратегия и тактика рационального применения антимикробных средств в амбулаторной практике: Евразийские клинические рекомендации. Москва, РФ: Изд-во «Пре100 Принт»; 2016. 144 с.
4. Косинец АН, Косинец ВА, Стручков ЮВ. Инфекция в хирургии. Минск, РБ; 2012. 496 с.
5. Jasemi S, Douraghi M, Adibhesami H, Zeraati H, Rahbar M, Boroumand MA, Aliramezani A, Ghourchian S, Mohammadzadeh M. Trend of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and the remaining therapeutic options: a multicenter study in Tehran, Iran over a 3-year period. Lett Appl Microbiol 2017;63(6):466-72. doi: 10.1111/lam.12669.
6. Mukhopadhyay C. Infection Control in Intensive Care Units. Indian J Respir Care. 2018;7:14-21. doi: 10.4103/ijrc.ijrc_9_17
7. Лазарева ИВ, Агеевец ВА, Ершова ТА, Зуева ЛП, Гончаров АЕ, Дарьина МГ, Светличная ЮС, Усков АН, Сидоренко СВ. Распространенность и антибактериальная резистентность грамотрицательных бактерий, продуцентов карбапенемаз, в Санкт-Петербурге и некоторых других регионах Российской Федерации. Антибиотики и Химиотерапия. 2016;61:11-12.
8. Hamprecht A, Gottig S. Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Curr Treat Options Infec Dis. 2014;6(4):425-38. doi: 10.1007/s40506-014-0029-x
9. Лагун ЛВ, Жаворонок СВ. Молекулярно-генетическая технология выявления резистентности энтеробактерий к бета-лактамным антибиотикам на основе геноиндикации бета-лактамаз расширенного спектра. Лабораторная Диагностика. 2012;2:74-85.
Review
For citations:
Fedyanin S.D., Okulich V.K. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in problem microorganisms in patients with purulent wounds. Health and Ecology Issues. 2020;(3):69-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2020-17-3-10