Preview

Health and Ecology Issues

Advanced search

Improving the efficiency of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate

https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2020-17-3-5

Abstract

Objective: to identify the most effective and affordable method to diagnose various types of fetal cleft lip and palate, the use of which is possible in the majority of specialized obstetric care facilities. Material and methods. The study included the results of ultrasound examination of fetuses (59 cases) in various modes with cleft lip and palate of various types within gestational periods from 16 to 36 weeks. Results. The sensitivity indices of the generally accepted method of two-dimensional B-mode ultrasound have been determined for diagnosing all types of clefts, which amounted to 81.3 %, and the sensitivity for diagnosing cleft palate and cleft lip and palate amounted to 80.3 %. The sensitivity indices of the newly developed diagnostic method (ultrasound elastography of the palate) have been determined, which amounted to 89.8 % in the diagnosis of all types of clefts, and 90.2 % in the diagnosis of cleft palate and cleft lip and palate (46/51). Demonstration of the image of the fetal face obtained during the three-dimensional B-mode reconstruction to its future parents helps the family to make a more balanced and correct decision on further pregnancy tactics. In cases of cleft palate, a new visualization diagnostic criterion has been defined - tongue bifurcation. MRI of the fetal head is not an effective and affordable method for the diagnosis of facial clefts, which can be widely used in practice. Conclusion: It is advisable and necessary to conduct an obligatory study of the karyotype in fetuses with crevices identified during imaging examination at any gestational age. As a new diagnostic criterion for cleft palate, detected by B-mode ultrasound, tongue bifurcation can be used. The utilization of the EN method in combination with the developed coloristic criteria for RHN and RN increases their prenatal detection in general population by 9.9 %. At the same time, the detectability of all types of crevices increases by 8.5 %. In order to objectify the explanations about the essence of revealed defects of the face and structures of the oral cavity, it is necessary to demonstrate a three-dimensional sonogram of the fetal face obtained during three-dimensional B-mode reconstruction to its future parents. MRI of the fetal head cannot be recommended as an effective and affordable method for diagnosing facial clefts due to the impossibility to obtain a satisfactory image in most cases.

About the Author

A. N. Chukanov
Belarusian Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education
Belarus

Alexei N. Chukanov — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Public Health and Healthcare, Associate Professor at the Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis of the SEE «Belarusian Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education»

e-mail: a.chukanov@tut.by



References

1. Mastroiacovo P, Maraschini A, Leoncini E, Mossey P, Bower C, Castilla EE, Feldkamp ML, et al. Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48:66-81.

2. Bister D, Set P, Cash C, Coleman N, Fanshawe T. Incidence of facial clefts in Cambridge, United Kingdom. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:372-6.

3. Maarse W, Bergé SJ, Pistorius L, vanBarneveld T, Kon M, Breugem C, Mink vanMolen AB. Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in detecting prenatal cleftlip and palate: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:495-02.

4. Martínez-Ten P, Perez-Pedregosa J, Santacruz B, Adiego B, Barron E, Sepulveda W. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of cleft palate: ‘reverse face’, ‘flipped face’ or ‘oblique face’-which method is best? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:399-406.

5. Campbell S, Lees C, Moscoso G, Halls P. Ultrasound antenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D ‘reverse face’ view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:12-8.

6. Faure JM, Captier G, Bäumler M, Boulot P. Sonographic assessment of normal fetal palate using three-dimensional imaging: a new technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:159-65.

7. Pilu G, Segata M. A novel technique for visualization of the normal and cleft fetal secondary palate: angled insonation and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:166-9.

8. Sepulveda W, Wong AE, Martínez-Ten P, Perez-Pedregosa J. Retronasal triangle: a sonographic land-mark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:7-13.

9. Tonni G, Centini G, Rosignoli L. Prenatal screening for fetal face and clefting in a prospective study on low-risk population: Can 3- and 4-dimensional ultra-sound enhance visualization and detection rate? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:420-6.

10. Wang LM, Leung KY, Tang M. Prenatal evaluation of facial clefts by three-dimensional extended imaging. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:722-9.

11. Lee W, Kirk JS, Shaheen KW, Hodges AN, Comstock CH. Fetal cleft lip and palate detection by three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:299-01.

12. Johnson DD, Pretorius DM, Budorick NE, Jones NE, Jones MC, Lou KV, James GM, et al. Fetal lip and primary palate; three-dimensional ultrasound. Radiology. 2000;217:236-9.

13. Descamps MJ, Golding SJ, Sibley J, McIntyre A, Alvey C, Goodacre T. MRI for definitive in utero diagnosis of cleft palate: a useful adjunct to antena-tal care? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47:578-85.

14. Чуканов АН. Комплексный подход к диагностике врожденных пороков развития центральной нервной системы и лицевых дисморфий плода. Минск, РБ: БелМАПО; 2016. 50 c.

15. Афiцыйны бюлетэнь: Национальный центр интеллектуальной собственности. Вынаходствы карысныя мадэлi прамысловыя ўзоры тапалогii iнтэгральных мiкрасхем. 2016;3(110). 65 с.


Review

For citations:


Chukanov A.N. Improving the efficiency of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Health and Ecology Issues. 2020;(3):36-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2020-17-3-5

Views: 453


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-0967 (Print)
ISSN 2708-6011 (Online)