Preview

Health and Ecology Issues

Advanced search

Institute of surrogacy in modern society. Part 1

https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2020-17-3-1

Abstract

Objective: to define the concept and essence of surrogacy, to study the history of its origin and approaches to solution of fertility problems with its help in different countries of the world, to analyze the attitude of modern generation to surrogacy. Material and methods. To achieve the above objective, various literary sources were analyzed. Also, a sociological survey of 60 students of Gomel State Medical University was conducted. Results. The performed analysis has found historical regularities of the use of surrogacy aimed at procreation since ancient times up till now. The retrospective statistical data of primary and secondary infertility in the world have been given. The modern possibilities of assisted reproductive technologies making it possible for childless families to have their own children have been described. The sociological survey has revealed that most boys and girls - 90 % are «for» using assisted reproductive technologies, and also the majority of the respondents think that it is acceptable to bring up a surrogate child by a single woman (85 %) or man (73 %). However, only 47 % of the respondents agree with the fact that a surrogate child may be raised by homosexual parents. Conclusion. Female and male infertility is a problem that is topical worldwide. Surrogacy is an assisted reproductive technology which in many cases is the only option for people to have their genetic children. In modern society, surrogacy is used by single women and men, including homosexuals. The attitude of modern generation to this fact is positive in most cases.

About the Authors

E. V. Chechenkova
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus

Elena V. Chechenkova — Assistant lecturer at the Department of Pediatrics of the EI «Gomel State Medical University»;

e-mail: lenaj@mail.ru



A. I. Zaryankina
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus

Alla I. Zariankina — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatrics of the EI «Gomel State Medical University»



References

1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R et al. Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;(5):78-89. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/art_ terminology2/ru/

2. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990. A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys. PLoS Med. 2012 Dec; 9(12):e1001356. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356

3. Современные подходы к диагностике и лечению женского бесплодия. Письмо Минздрава России от 05.03.2019 N 15-4/И/2-1913 утв. Российским обществом акушеров-гинекологов 28.12.2018, Российской ассоциацией репродукции человека 21.12.2018.

4. Лебедев ГС, Голубев НА, Шадеркин ИА, Шадеркина, ВА, Аполихин ОИ и др. Мужское бесплодие в Российской Федерации: статистические данные за 2000-2018 годы. Рос Журн Экспериментальная и Клиническая Урология. 2019;(4):4-13. Режим доступа: https://www.uroweb.ru/article/mugskoe-besplodie-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-statisticheskie-dannie-za-2000-2018-godi

5. Зайцев ДВ. ред. Православная энциклопедия. Москва, РФ: Церковно-научный центр; 2003. c. 412-28.

6. Брокгауз ФА, Ефрон ИА. ред. Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона. Москва, РФ: Директ-Медиа; 2014. 1384 с.

7. Льюис ДМ, Бордмэн Д, Хорнблоуэр С, Оствальд М. ред. Кембриджская история древнего мира. Том. VI (Первый полутом). Четвертый век до нашей эры: монография. Москва, РФ: Научно-издательский центр «Ладомир»; 2017. 624 с.

8. Тишков ВА. ред. Народы и религии мира. Москва, РФ: Большая Российская Энциклопедия; 1999. с. 237-38.

9. Bergh C, Romundstad LB, Aittomäki K, Pinborg A, Loft A, et al. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families - a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 22(2):260-76. doi : 10.1093/humupd/dmv046

10. Gerkowicz SA , Crawford SB , Hipp HS , Boulet SL , Kissin DM , Kawwass JF.Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(4):421.e1-421.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog. 2017.12.224. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

11. Morsan V, Gronchi G, Zanchettin L, Tallandini MA. Parental disclosure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception to their children: a system-atic and meta-analytic review. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(6):1275-87. doi : 10.1093/humrep/dew068. ISSN 0268-1161. PMID 27067509

12. Ashworth JR. Surrogate Pregnancy. Clinical Management of Pregnancies Following ART. 2017 Nov;(12):211-20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42858-1_12

13. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, et al. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2018;67(SS-3):1-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/ mmwr.ss6703 a1external icon


Review

For citations:


Chechenkova E.V., Zaryankina A.I. Institute of surrogacy in modern society. Part 1. Health and Ecology Issues. 2020;(3):5-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2020-17-3-1

Views: 1238


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-0967 (Print)
ISSN 2708-6011 (Online)