Colorectal cancer screening
https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2014-11-3-10
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of death from malignant neoplasm. Most cases of colorectal cancer are caused by sporadic adenoma, and few cases develop in patients with genetically determined polyposis syndromes or inflammatory bowel disease. The article covers modern approaches to screening, testing of asymptomatic men and women who are likely to have adenomatous polyps or colorectal cancer.
Keywords
About the Author
A. D. Borsuk
Republican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, Gomel
Belarus
Belarus
References
1. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup / S. J. Winawer [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1993. - Vol. 329. - P. 1977-1981.
2. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test / O. Kronborg [et al.] // Lancet. - 1996. - Vol. 348. - P. 1467-1471.
3. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer / J. D. Hardcastle [et al.] // Lancet. - 1996. - Vol. 348. - P. 1472-1477.
4. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer / J. V. Selby [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1992. - Vol. 326. - P. 653-657.
5. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality / P. A. Newcomb [et al.] // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. - 1992. - Vol. 84. - P. 1572-1575.
6. Wilson, J. M. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease / J. M. Wilson, Y. G. Jungner // Bol. Oficina Sanit. Panam. - 1968. - Vol. 65. - P. 281-393.
7. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update / P. Hewitson [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2008. - Vol. 103. - P. 1541-1549.
8. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics / J. E. Allison [et al.] // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. - 2007. - Vol. 99. - P. 1462-1470.
9. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population / T. F. Imperiale [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2004. - Vol. 351. - P. 2704-2714.
10. Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test / D. Heresbach [et al.] // Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. - 2006. - Vol. 18. - P. 427-433.
11. Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels / L. Hol [et al.] // Br. J. Cancer. - 2009. - Vol. 100. - P. 1103-1110.
12. Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme / L. G. van Rossum [et al.] // Br. J. Cancer. - 2009. - Vol. 101. - P. 1274-1281.
13. Sensitivity of immunochemical fecal occult blood test to small colorectal adenomas / T. Morikawa [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2007. - Vol. 102. - P. 2259-2264.
14. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population / L. G. van Rossum [et al.] // Gastroenterology. - 2008. - Vol. 135. - P. 82-90.
15. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy / L. Hol [et al.] // Gut. - 2010. - Vol. 59. - P. 62-68.
16. Cluster randomization trial of sequence mass screening for colorectal cancer / S. Zheng [et al.] // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2003. - Vol. 46. - P. 51-58.
17. Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia / D. A. Ahlquist [et al.] // Ann. Intern. Med. - 2008. - Vol. 149. - P. 441-450.
18. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings / T. F. Imperiale [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2000. - Vol. 343. - P. 169-174.
19. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening / N. Segnan [et al.] // Gastroenterology. - 2007. - Vol. 132. - P. 2304-2312.
20. Detection of proximal adenomatous polyps with screening sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy / J. D. Lewis [et al.] // Arch. Intern. Med. - 2003. - Vol. 163. - P. 413-420.
21. Diagnostic value of distal colonic polyps for prediction of advanced proximal neoplasia in an average-risk population undergoing screening colonoscopy / I. M. Betes [et al.] // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2004. - Vol. 59. - P. 634-641.
22. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial / W. S. Atkin [et al.] // Lancet. - 2010. - Vol. 375. - P. 1624-1633.
23. Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial / G. Hoff [et al.] // BMJ. - 2009. - Vol. 338. - P. 1846.
24. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review / J. C. van Rijn [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2006. - Vol. 101. - P. 343-350.
25. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy / R. L. Barclay [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2006. - Vol. 355. - P. 2533-2541.
26. Harewood, G. C. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia / G. C. Harewood, V. K. Sharma, P. de Garmo // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2003. - Vol. 58. - P. 76-79.
27. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions / R. Marmo [et al.] // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2010. - Vol. 72. - P. 313-320.
28. Rex, D. K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates / D. K. Rex // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2000. - Vol. 51. - P. 33-36.
29. Brenner, H. Eight years of colonoscopic bowel cancer screening in Germany: initial findings and projections / H. Brenner, L. Altenhofen, M. Hoffmeister // Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. - 2010. - Vol. 107. - P. 753-759.
30. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies / H. Singh [et al.] // JAMA. - 2006. - Vol. 295. - P. 2366-2373.
31. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? / H. Brenner [et al.] // Gut. - 2006. - Vol. 55. - P. 1145-1150.
32. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer / A. van Gossum [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2009. - Vol. 361. - P. 264-270.
33. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy / R. Eliakim [et al.] // Endoscopy. - 2009. - Vol. 41. - P. 1026-1031.
34. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults / P. J. Pickhardt [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2003. - Vol. 349. - P. 2191-2200.
35. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers / C. D. Johnson [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2008. - Vol. 359. - P. 1207-1217.
36. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia / D. H. Kim [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2007. - Vol. 357. - P. 1403-1412.
37. Zijta, F. M. Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies / F. M. Zijta, S. Bipat, J. Stoker // Eur. Radiol. - 2010. - Vol. 20. - P. 1031-1046.
38. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population / C. A. Kuehle [et al.] // Gut. - 2007. - Vol. 56. - P. 1079-1085.
39. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison / D. C. Rockey [et al.] // Lancet. - 2005. - Vol. 365. - P. 305-311.
Review
For citations:
Borsuk A.D. Colorectal cancer screening. Health and Ecology Issues. 2014;(3):56-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2014-11-3-10
Views: 302
Email this article 