СКРИНИНГ КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНОГО РАКА (обзор литературы)
https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2014-11-3-10
Аннотация
Колоректальный рак занимает второе место по смертности от злокачественных новообразований. Чаще всего он возникает из аденом толстой кишки, реже - у пациентов с генетически детерминированными синдромами полипоза или воспалительными заболеваниями кишки. В статье изложены современные подходы к скринингу - обследованию бессимптомных мужчин и женщин, у которых имеется высокая вероятность наличия аденоматозных полипов или колоректального рака.
Ключевые слова
Об авторе
А. Д. Борсук
Республиканский научно-практический центр радиационной медицины и экологии человека, г. Гомель
Беларусь
Беларусь
Список литературы
1. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup / S. J. Winawer [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1993. - Vol. 329. - P. 1977-1981.
2. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test / O. Kronborg [et al.] // Lancet. - 1996. - Vol. 348. - P. 1467-1471.
3. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer / J. D. Hardcastle [et al.] // Lancet. - 1996. - Vol. 348. - P. 1472-1477.
4. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer / J. V. Selby [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1992. - Vol. 326. - P. 653-657.
5. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality / P. A. Newcomb [et al.] // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. - 1992. - Vol. 84. - P. 1572-1575.
6. Wilson, J. M. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease / J. M. Wilson, Y. G. Jungner // Bol. Oficina Sanit. Panam. - 1968. - Vol. 65. - P. 281-393.
7. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update / P. Hewitson [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2008. - Vol. 103. - P. 1541-1549.
8. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics / J. E. Allison [et al.] // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. - 2007. - Vol. 99. - P. 1462-1470.
9. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population / T. F. Imperiale [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2004. - Vol. 351. - P. 2704-2714.
10. Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test / D. Heresbach [et al.] // Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. - 2006. - Vol. 18. - P. 427-433.
11. Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels / L. Hol [et al.] // Br. J. Cancer. - 2009. - Vol. 100. - P. 1103-1110.
12. Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme / L. G. van Rossum [et al.] // Br. J. Cancer. - 2009. - Vol. 101. - P. 1274-1281.
13. Sensitivity of immunochemical fecal occult blood test to small colorectal adenomas / T. Morikawa [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2007. - Vol. 102. - P. 2259-2264.
14. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population / L. G. van Rossum [et al.] // Gastroenterology. - 2008. - Vol. 135. - P. 82-90.
15. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy / L. Hol [et al.] // Gut. - 2010. - Vol. 59. - P. 62-68.
16. Cluster randomization trial of sequence mass screening for colorectal cancer / S. Zheng [et al.] // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2003. - Vol. 46. - P. 51-58.
17. Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia / D. A. Ahlquist [et al.] // Ann. Intern. Med. - 2008. - Vol. 149. - P. 441-450.
18. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings / T. F. Imperiale [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2000. - Vol. 343. - P. 169-174.
19. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening / N. Segnan [et al.] // Gastroenterology. - 2007. - Vol. 132. - P. 2304-2312.
20. Detection of proximal adenomatous polyps with screening sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy / J. D. Lewis [et al.] // Arch. Intern. Med. - 2003. - Vol. 163. - P. 413-420.
21. Diagnostic value of distal colonic polyps for prediction of advanced proximal neoplasia in an average-risk population undergoing screening colonoscopy / I. M. Betes [et al.] // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2004. - Vol. 59. - P. 634-641.
22. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial / W. S. Atkin [et al.] // Lancet. - 2010. - Vol. 375. - P. 1624-1633.
23. Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial / G. Hoff [et al.] // BMJ. - 2009. - Vol. 338. - P. 1846.
24. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review / J. C. van Rijn [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2006. - Vol. 101. - P. 343-350.
25. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy / R. L. Barclay [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2006. - Vol. 355. - P. 2533-2541.
26. Harewood, G. C. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia / G. C. Harewood, V. K. Sharma, P. de Garmo // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2003. - Vol. 58. - P. 76-79.
27. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions / R. Marmo [et al.] // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2010. - Vol. 72. - P. 313-320.
28. Rex, D. K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates / D. K. Rex // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2000. - Vol. 51. - P. 33-36.
29. Brenner, H. Eight years of colonoscopic bowel cancer screening in Germany: initial findings and projections / H. Brenner, L. Altenhofen, M. Hoffmeister // Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. - 2010. - Vol. 107. - P. 753-759.
30. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies / H. Singh [et al.] // JAMA. - 2006. - Vol. 295. - P. 2366-2373.
31. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? / H. Brenner [et al.] // Gut. - 2006. - Vol. 55. - P. 1145-1150.
32. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer / A. van Gossum [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2009. - Vol. 361. - P. 264-270.
33. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy / R. Eliakim [et al.] // Endoscopy. - 2009. - Vol. 41. - P. 1026-1031.
34. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults / P. J. Pickhardt [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2003. - Vol. 349. - P. 2191-2200.
35. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers / C. D. Johnson [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2008. - Vol. 359. - P. 1207-1217.
36. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia / D. H. Kim [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2007. - Vol. 357. - P. 1403-1412.
37. Zijta, F. M. Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies / F. M. Zijta, S. Bipat, J. Stoker // Eur. Radiol. - 2010. - Vol. 20. - P. 1031-1046.
38. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population / C. A. Kuehle [et al.] // Gut. - 2007. - Vol. 56. - P. 1079-1085.
39. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison / D. C. Rockey [et al.] // Lancet. - 2005. - Vol. 365. - P. 305-311.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Борсук А.Д. СКРИНИНГ КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНОГО РАКА (обзор литературы). Проблемы здоровья и экологии. 2014;(3):56-61. https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2014-11-3-10
For citation:
Borsuk A.D. Colorectal cancer screening. Health and Ecology Issues. 2014;(3):56-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2014-11-3-10
Просмотров: 300
Послать статью по эл. почте 