Preview

Health and Ecology Issues

Advanced search

THE BLOCKADE OF THE SCIATIC NERVE BY SUBGLUTEAL AND POPLITEAL ACCESS PERFORMED UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE: COMPARISON OF TIME OF THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT DEPENDING ON THE ACCESS

https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2014-11-2-14

Abstract

Purpose. The comparison of time needed for development of peripheral blockade of the sciatic nerve, made with 1 % lidocaine and adrenaline (1:200 000) under ultrasound guidance of the subgluteal and popliteal access. Material and methods. Patients were divided into two groups. In group A (20 patients), the blockade of the sciatic nerve was performed by the subgluteal access, in group B (20 patients) - by popliteal access. All the blockades of the sciatic nerve were performed with 30 ml of 1 % lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200 000) with the use of electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerves under control ultrasonic imaging. Results. In group A, the sciatic nerve sensory block developed in 15 (14, 16) minutes, the complete motor block developed in 15.5 (15, 17). In group B, the sensor block developed in 40 (38.5, 42.5) minutes, the complete motor block did not develop in any patients. Conclusion. The blockade of the sciatic nerve blockade with 1% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200 000) under ultrasound guidance leads to faster development of thr subgluteal access sensor block than in its blockade of the popliteal access (15 (14, 16 ) vs. 40 minutes (38, 5 , 42.5 ) minutes, respectively.

About the Author

V. G. Pechersky
Mogilev Regional Hospital Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Belarus


References

1. Марочков, А. В. Блокада седалищного нерва малыми дозами ропивакаина / А. В. Марочков // Медицина. - 2012. - № 2 - С. 60-62.

2. Кованов, В. В. Оперативная хирургия и топографическая анатомия / В. В. Кованов. - М.: Медицина, 1977. - 416 с.

3. Piacherski, V. A comparison of the onset time of complete blockade of the sciatic nerve in the application of ropivacaine and its equal volumes mixture with lidocaine: a double-blind randomized study / V. Piacherski, A. Marochkov // Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. - 2013. - Vol. 65 (1). - P. 42. doi:10.4097/kjae.2013.65.1.42.

4. Kilpatrick, A. W. A comparison of two approaches to sciatic nerve block / A. W. Kilpatrick, D. M. Coventry, J. G. Todd // Anaesthesia. - 1992. - Vol. 47. - P. 155.

5. The effects of three different approaches on the onset time of sciatic nerve blocks with 0.75% ropivacaine / M. Taboada [et al.] // Anesth Analg. - 2004. - Vol. 98. - P. 242.

6. Does the site of injection distal to the greater trochanter make a difference in lateral sciatic nerve blockade? / M. Taboada[et al.] // Anesth Analg. - 2005. - Vol. 101. - P.1188-1191.

7. Chelly, J. E. Peripherial nerve blocks: a color atlas. 3-rd ed. / J. E. Chelly // Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2009. - P. 1-474.

8. Марочков, А. В. Выбор доступа для блокады седалищного нерва при обеспечении хирургических вмешательств на нижних конечностях / А. В. Марочков // Хирургия. Восточная европа. - 2013. - № 1. - С. 76-81.

9. Nizar Moayeri. Differences in quantitative architecture of sciatic nerve may explain differences in potential vulnerability to nerve injury, onset time, and minimum effective anesthetic volume / Moayeri Nizar, Gerbrand J. Groen // Anesthesiology - 2009. - Vol. 111. - P. 1128-1134.

10. Intraneural injection with low-current stimulation during popliteal sciatic nerve block / C. Robards [et al.] // Anesth Analg. - 2009. - Vol. 109(2). - P. 673-677.


Review

For citations:


Pechersky V.G. THE BLOCKADE OF THE SCIATIC NERVE BY SUBGLUTEAL AND POPLITEAL ACCESS PERFORMED UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE: COMPARISON OF TIME OF THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT DEPENDING ON THE ACCESS. Health and Ecology Issues. 2014;(2):67-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2014-11-2-14

Views: 291


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-0967 (Print)
ISSN 2708-6011 (Online)