USE OF DATA OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2008-5-2-6
Abstract
The purpose of article is the review of principles of evidence based medicine and the meta-analysis. A prominent aspect of evidence based medicine is definition of degree of reliability of the information. Quantitative association of the given various clinical researches by means of the meta-analysis allows to receive results which cannot be received from separate clinical researches. Reading and studying of systematic reviews and results of the meta-analysis allows to be guided more effectively in a considerable quantity of published articles.
About the Authors
A. L. Kalinin
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus
Belarus
A. A. Litvin
Gomel Regional Clinical Hospital
Belarus
Belarus
N. M. Trizna
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus
Belarus
References
1. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis for the surgeon scientist / S. S.Mahidl [et al.] // Br. J. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 93. - P. 1315-1324.
2. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts / E. T.Antman [et al.] // JAMA. - 1992. - Vol. 268, N 2. - P. 240-248.
3. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t / D. L. Sackett [et al.] // BMJ. - 1996. - Vol. 312. - P. 71-72.
4. Egger, M. Meta-analysis: potentials and promise / M. Egger, S. G. Davey // BMJ. - 1997. - Vol. 315. - P. 1371-1374.
5. Юрьев, К. Л. Доказательная медицина. Кокрановское сотрудничество / К. Л. Юрьев, К. Н. Логановский // Укр. мед. часопис. - 2000. - № 6. - С. 20-25.
6. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. - London: BMJ Publishing Group and Update Software, 1995. - 260 p.
7. Davies, H. Что такое мета-анализ? / H. Davies, I. Crombie // Клиническая фармакология и фармакотерапия. - 1999. - № 8. - C. 10-16.
8. Egger, M. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures / M. Egger, S. G. Davey, A. N. Phillips // BMJ. - 1997. - Vol. 315. - P. 1533-1537.
9. Lewis, S. Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees / S. Lewis, M. Clarke // BMJ. - 2001. - Vol. 322. - P. 1479-1480.
10. Bero, L. The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care / L. Bero, D. Rennie // JAMA. - 1995. - Vol. 274. - P. 1935-1938.
11. Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? / L. Mc. Auley [et al.] // Lancet. - 2000. - Vol. 356. - P. 1228-1231.
12. Fleiss, J. L. The statistical basis of meta-analysis / J. L. Fleiss // Stat. Methods Med. Res. - 1993. - Vol. 2. - P. 121-145.
13. Greenland, S. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods / S. Greenland // Am. J. Epidemiol. - 1994. - Vol. 140. - P. 290-296.
14. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests / L. Irwig [et al.] // Ann. Intern. Med. - 1994. - Vol. 120. - P. 667-676.
15. Stewart, L. A. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group / L. A. Stewart, M. J. Clarke // Stat. Med. - 1995. - Vol. 14. - P. 2057-2579.
16. Гринхальх, Т. Основы доказательной медицины / Т. Гринхальх; пер. с англ. - М.: ГЭОТАР - Медиа, 2006. - 240 с.
17. Olkin, I. Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis / I. Olkin // J. Clin. Epidemiol. - 1995. - Vol. 48. - P. 133-146.
18. Villar, J. Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials / J. Villar, G. Carroli, J. M. Belizan // Lancet. - 1995. - Vol. 345. - P. 772-776.
19. Deeks, J.J. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests / J. J. Deeks // BMJ. - 2001. - Vol. 323. - P.157-162.
Review
For citations:
Kalinin A.L., Litvin A.A., Trizna N.M. USE OF DATA OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE (literature review). Health and Ecology Issues. 2008;(2):27-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2008-5-2-6
Views: 312
Email this article 