Preview

Health and Ecology Issues

Advanced search

Risk factors for neonatal intrauterine infection in pregnant women with urogenital infection

https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2021-18-3-9

Abstract

Objective. To determine the clinical and anamnestic risk factors for neonatal intrauterine infection (IUI) in pregnant women with urogenital infections (UGI).

Materials and methods. 431 patients were examined: the main group (group 1) — 353 women with UGI during pregnancy (subgroup 1A — 215 women whose children were diagnosed with IUI, subgroup 1B — 138 women whose children were born without signs of IUI; the comparison group (group 2) — 78 women without UGI during pregnancy (subgroup 2A — 44 patients whose children were born with signs of IUI, subgroup 2B — 34 women whose children did not have IUI. We studied the obstetric and gynecological, somatic anamnesis of the patients, the course of their pregnancy.

Results. The presence of gynecological and somatic diseases in the anamnesis of the pregnant women with UGI was associated with a signifcant increase of the risk for neonatal IUI (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). Vaginitis (p = 0.041), background and precancerous diseases of the cervix (p = 0.027) were signifcantly most prevalent in the pregnant women with UGIs in their history. Pregnancy complicated by UGI proceeded with a recurrent miscarriage risk (p = 0.046) was most often accompanied by acute respiratory infection (p ˂ 0.001) and signifcantly most often ended in premature birth — 24.7% (p = 0.009).

Conclusion. The search for objective criteria for the development of neonatal IUI is an important and complex task of modern obstetrics. The analysis of the anamnesis of pregnant women with urogenital infections, as well as timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of urogenital infection and acute respiratory infection will reduce the miscarriage rate and the incidence rate of neonatal IUI.

About the Authors

T. N. Zakharenkova
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus

Tatiana N. Zakharenkova, PhD (Med), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of the Faculty of Professional Development and Retraining 

Gomel



E. L. Lashkevich
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus

Elena L. Lashkevich, PhD (Med), Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of the Faculty of Professional Development and Retraining 

Gomel



E. L. Lakudas
Gomel State Medical University
Belarus

Elena L. Lakudas, PhD (Med), Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course of the Faculty of Professional Development and Retraining 

Gomel



References

1. Bennett PR, Brown RG, MacIntyre DA. Vaginal Microbiome in Preterm Rupture of Membranes. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;47(4):503-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2020.08.001

2. Ozolinja LA, Bahareva IV, Tjagunova AV. Effect of various factors on fetus. Moskov: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. p. 94-99. (in Russ.).

3. Zakharenkova TN, Kaplan JuD. Effect of the microbiota of the urogenital tract on pregnancy outcome. Akusherstvo. Ginekologija. Genetika. 2019;5(1):5-15. (in Russ.).

4. Posiseeva LV. Intrauterine infection: questions and answers. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2020;19(2):124-128. (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2020-2-124-128

5. Fofanova IJu. Bacterial infections in obstetrics and gynecology. Modern view on the problem. Moskov: GEOTAR-Media; 2018; 160 p. [date of access 2021 June 20]. Available from: http://www.studmedlib.ru/book/ISBN9785970446300.html (in Russ.).

6. Gravett MG. Successful treatment of intraamniotic infection/inflammation: a paradigm shift. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):83-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.020

7. Lashkevich EL, Voronovich GV. A long anhydrous period — a possible outcome. Health and Ecology Issues. 2020;(3):109-114. [date of access 2021 May 23]. Available from: https://journal.gsmu.by/jour/article/view/272 (In Russ.)

8. Han X, Du H, Cao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zhang L at all. Association of histological and clinical chorioamnionitis with perinatal and neonatal outcome. Journal of MaternalFetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2021;34(5):794-802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1618824

9. Al-Haddad BJS, Jacobsson B, Chabra S, Modzelewska D, Olson EM, Bernier R, et al. Long-term risk of neuropsychiatric disease after exposure to infection in utero. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(6):594-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0029

10. Dolgushina VF, Dolgushin II, Kurnosenko IV, Lebedeva YuV. Clinical and immunological criteria of intrauterine infection. Obstetrics and Gynegolog. 2017;(1):40-45. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.1.40-5 (in Russ.)

11. Pelzer E, Gomez-Arango LF, Barrett HL, Nitert MD. Review: maternal health and the placental microbiome. Placenta. 2017;54:30-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2016.12.003

12. Larsson PG, Poutakidis G, Adolfsson A, Charonis G, Pasi B, Ekström L. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and its effect on spontaneous preterm delivery and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Clin microbial. 2016;5:5.

13. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2327-5073.1000259 13. Zakharenkova TN, Kaplan YuD. Ischemic-Cervical Insuffciency as a Risk Factor for Intrauterine Infection. Health and Ecology Issues. 2019;(4):27-32. [date of access 2021 May 23]. Available from: https://journal.gsmu.by/jour/article/view/272 (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Zakharenkova T.N., Lashkevich E.L., Lakudas E.L. Risk factors for neonatal intrauterine infection in pregnant women with urogenital infection. Health and Ecology Issues. 2021;18(3):72-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2021-18-3-9

Views: 362


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-0967 (Print)
ISSN 2708-6011 (Online)