<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">zdor</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Проблемы здоровья и экологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Health and Ecology Issues</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2220-0967</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2708-6011</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Gomel State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51523/2708-6011.2019-16-1-9</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">zdor-95</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКАЯ МЕДИЦИНА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL MEDICINE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ПРЕДИКТОРЫ ЗАТЯНУВШЕГОСЯ ВТОРОГО ПЕРИОДА РОДОВ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Predictors of Prolonged Second Stage of Labor</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Калачёв</surname><given-names>В. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kalachev</surname><given-names>V. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Захаренкова</surname><given-names>Т. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zakharenkova</surname><given-names>T. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Учреждение образования «Гомельский государственный медицинский университет»</institution><country>Belarus</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Калачёв В.Н., Захаренкова Т.Н., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Калачёв В.Н., Захаренкова Т.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kalachev V.N., Zakharenkova T.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.gsmu.by/jour/article/view/95">https://journal.gsmu.by/jour/article/view/95</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель: изучить предикторы затянувшегося второго периода родов. Материалы и методы. Проведено исследование родов, осложненных затянувшимся вторым периодом (n = 120). Анализ полученных данных проводился в сравнении с группой контроля, в которую вошли первородящие женщины с физиологическими родами (n = 30). Результаты. Роды, осложненные затянувшимся вторым периодом, значимо чаще начинались с индукции (р = 0,001), значительно чаще была потребность в окситоцине в родах (58 % против 36,6 % в группе контроля; р = 0,034), длительность первого периода была больше (435 (295; 520) мин против 305 (255; 470) мин; р = 0,035), а также отмечена более высокая частота заднего вида затылочного предлежания (14,8 % против 3,3 % в группе контроля; р &lt; 0,001)). Заключение. Применение родоиндукции, необходимость использования окситоцина, а также задний вид затылочного предлежания являются предикторами затянувшегося второго периода родов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Objective: to study the predictors of prolonged second stage of labor. Material and methods. The study of labors complicated by prolonged second stage has been performed (n = 120). The analysis of the obtained data was carried out in comparison with those of the control group which included primiparas with physiological delivery (n = 30). Results. The labors complicated by prolonged second stage more often started with induction (p = 0.001), more often there was a necessity for oxytocin in delivery (58 % vs 36.6 % in the control group; p = 0.034), the duration of the first stage was longer (435 (295; 520) min vs 305 (255; 470) min; p = 0.035), as well as a higher frequency rate of occiput posterior presentation was noted (14.8% versus 3.3% in the control group; p &lt; 0.001)). Conclusion. The application of labor induction, the necessity for the use of oxytocin, as well as occipital posterior presentation are the predictors for prolonged second period of labor.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>затянувшийся второй период родов</kwd><kwd>вакуум-экстракция</kwd><kwd>кесарево сечение</kwd><kwd>задний вид затылочного предлежания</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>prolonged second period of labor</kwd><kwd>vacuum extraction</kwd><kwd>cesarean section</kwd><kwd>occiput posterior presentation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ACOG Practice Bulletin: No. 49. Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;(85);315-24; doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(04)00096-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ACOG Practice Bulletin: No. 49. Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;(85);315-24; doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(04)00096-7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 71. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician - gynecologists. 2006;71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 71. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician - gynecologists. 2006;71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Myles T, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:52-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Myles T, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:52-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:85-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:85-7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: Does a prolonged secondstage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210 (6):536.e1-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: Does a prolonged secondstage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210 (6):536.e1-7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пирогова НИ. Оперативное акушерство. Здоровье Украины. 2011;5:18-20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Пирогова НИ. Оперативное акушерство. Здоровье Украины. 2011;5:18-20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davis G, Fleming T, Ford K, Mouawad MR, Ludlow J. Caesarean section at full cervical dilatation. Aust NZ J Obstet&amp; Gynecol. 2015;55(6):565-71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davis G, Fleming T, Ford K, Mouawad MR, Ludlow J. Caesarean section at full cervical dilatation. Aust NZ J Obstet&amp; Gynecol. 2015;55(6):565-71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhu B, Grigorescu V, Le T. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:121</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhu B, Grigorescu V, Le T. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:121</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Krauss I, Douglas J, Goulet C, Boulvain M. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural anesthesia. The PEOPLE (pushing early or pushing late with epidural) study group. Am J Obstet and Gynecol.2000;182(5):1165-72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Krauss I, Douglas J, Goulet C, Boulvain M. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural anesthesia. The PEOPLE (pushing early or pushing late with epidural) study group. Am J Obstet and Gynecol.2000;182(5):1165-72.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(3):198-200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(3):198-200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Induction of labour data. WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. Geneva, World health Organization, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Induction of labour data. WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. Geneva, World health Organization, 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ponkey S, Cohen A, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(5):915-20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ponkey S, Cohen A, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(5):915-20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
